Simply: The true causes of the russian invasion of Ukraine

Russia’s 2022 onslaught against Ukraine was not a sudden lurch into war, but the climax of eight years of hybrid aggression that began with the seizure of Crimea. Broken nuclear-era assurances, imperial ideology, fears of NATO, regime-survival instincts, resource ambitions, hard-line nationalist pressure, and fatal misreading of Kyiv and the West converged to produce Europe’s largest war since 1945.

Introduction: From a Long Hybrid War to a Full-Scale Assault

Russia’s 24 February 2022 onslaught did not erupt overnight. It crowned eight years of undeclared, “hybrid” hostilities launched with the seizure of Crimea in 2014 and rested on still deeper ideological, security, and regime-survival calculations in the Kremlin.


0 | The Long Hybrid Conflict, Crimea’s Annexation, and Broken Assurances

  • Crimea and the birth of hybrid warfare (March 2014). Masked Russian troops in unmarked uniforms—nicknamed “little green men”—took over Ukrainian bases and parliament buildings, clearing the way for Moscow’s annexation of the peninsula after a lightning referendum that violated both Ukrainian law and multiple international agreements. APLWikipedia
  • Donbas proxy war (2014-2021). While insisting it was not a party to the conflict, the Kremlin armed, financed, and often commanded separatist forces in the self-declared “people’s republics” of Donetsk and Luhansk, causing more than 14 000 battlefield deaths before 2022.
  • Russia’s narrative of a “Western-backed coup.” Inside Russia, the Euromaidan revolution that toppled President Viktor Yanukovych in February 2014 is still framed as a U.S.-orchestrated coup—an enduring propaganda theme used to justify aggression. Foreign PolicyThe Kyiv Independent
  • The Budapest Memorandum, 1994. When Kyiv surrendered the world’s third-largest nuclear arsenal, Moscow, Washington, and London pledged to “respect the independence and territorial integrity of Ukraine” and to refrain from the threat or use of force. Russia’s actions in 2014 and again in 2022 shattered those assurances, fueling today’s calls in Kyiv for binding security guarantees. Harvard Kennedy SchoolUnited Nations Treaty CollectionReuters

These broken promises and the grinding low-intensity war turned Ukraine from a post-Soviet neighbor into the main front in Moscow’s attempt to revise the European order.


1 | Historical and Ideological Roots of Imperial Revisionism

In July 2021 Vladimir Putin published his essay “On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians,” denying Ukraine’s separate nationhood and depicting its modern borders as an historical mistake—an ideological lodestar for the coming invasion. Kremlin


2 | The Security Motive and the NATO Enlargement Dispute

The Kremlin portrayed the assault as a defensive move against hypothetical NATO expansion. In December 2021 it issued two draft treaties demanding a Ukrainian veto in NATO and a pull-back of allied forces to their 1997 lines—terms Western capitals rejected, viewing them as a pretext to restore a Russian sphere of influence rather than avert a real military threat. Wikipedia


3 | Revisionist Quest for a Sphere of Influence and Pushback Against the Liberal Order

Realist-leaning analyses stress Moscow’s bid to overturn the post-Cold-War status quo, rebuild a buffer zone, and dilute U.S. influence in Eastern Europe—part of a wider, authoritarian pushback against the liberal international order.


4 | Domestic Political Factors: Preventive and Diversionary Logic

Many scholars label the war “preventive”: Putin feared Ukraine’s irreversible westward drift—and its democratic example—could destabilize his own autocratic rule. The invasion also served a diversionary purpose, rallying nationalist sentiment and distracting from economic stagnation and repression at home.


5 | Economic and Strategic Interests

Eastern Ukraine’s Donbas and the Black Sea coast contain rich coal, metal, and agricultural resources plus critical ports. By occupying parts of these regions, Russia seized about 12 percent of Ukraine’s territory—together with offshore gas fields formerly operated by state-owned Chornomornaftogaz on the Black Sea shelf. Atlantic Council


6 | Pressure from Nationalist “Z-Patriots”

Since 2022 a vocal bloc of ultranationalist bloggers, veterans, and so-called “angry patriots” or Z-patriots has demanded maximalist war aims—capturing Kyiv or Odesa—and attacks any hint of compromise, narrowing the Kremlin’s perceived exit options. Wikipedia


7 | Diplomatic Failure and Strategic Miscalculation

U.S.–Russia, NATO–Russia, and OSCE talks in January–February 2022 deadlocked on Moscow’s zero-enlargement demand. Putin’s circle expected Kyiv to fold within days and the West to splinter over sanctions—a fatal misreading of Ukrainian resilience and transatlantic unity.


Conclusion: A Multi-Layered Causality

Russia’s full-scale invasion is best understood as the culmination of its hybrid war begun in 2014, its breach of the Budapest assurances, and a toxic blend of imperial ideology, fear of NATO, domestic regime needs, economic opportunism, and strategic overconfidence. No single strand explains the decision; together they reveal why a simmering conflict escalated into Europe’s largest state-on-state war since 1945.


Discover more from War History Archive

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

More From Author

The War of Words: Psychological Operations and Propaganda in WWII Europe

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Our mission is to delve into the experiences of individuals and societies affected by conflict, shedding light on the personal, cultural, and historical impacts of warfare throughout history. 
We will be glad if you follow us on TwitterSpotify or join our FB page